


Books in series

Exploring Inner Experience
2006

Signs, Mind, and Reality
2006

Imagery And Spatial Cognition
Methods models and cognitive assessment
2006

Visual Thought
The depictive space of perception
2006

On Being Moved
From Mirror Neurons to Empathy
2007

Conceptual Atomism and the Computational Theory of Mind
A defense of content-internalism and semantic externalism
2007

To Understand a Cat
2007

Embodiment in Cognition and Culture
2007
The Reflexive Nature of Consciousness
2008

Constructing the Self
2008
Animating Expressive Characters for Social Interaction
2008

The Intersubjective Mirror in Infant Learning and Evolution of Speech
2009

The Transparent Becoming of World
A Crossing Between Process Philosophy and Quantum Neurophilosophy
2009

New Horizons in the Neuroscience of Consciousness
2010

Mind Ascribed
2010

Becoming Human
From Pointing Gestures to Syntax
2011

The Primacy of Movement
1723
Phenomenology and the Physical Reality of Consciousness
2011

Body Memory, Metaphor and Movement
2012
Consciousness in Interaction. the Role of the Natural and Social Context in Shaping Consciousness.
2012

Empiricism and the Foundations of Psychology
2012
Authors

סם ש. רקובר הוא פרופסור לפסיכולוגיה באוניברסיטת חיפה .תחומי התעניינותו - תפיסה וזיכרון פרצופים, ופילוסופיה של המדע והתודעה .סם ש. רקובר פרסם מספר רב של סיפורים קצרים בירחונים ועיתונים שונים .כפסיכולוג, פרסם גם ספרים ומאמרים רבים בתחומי התמחותו פרסומים מקצועיים :רקובר פרסם 4 ספרים מקצועיים (1991)-Metapsychology: Missing Links in Behavior, Mind and Science (2001)- Explanation : Theoretical Approaches and Applications (with Giora Hon) (2001)- Face Recognition (with Baruch Cahlon) (2008) 'להבין חתול - מתודולוגיה ופילוסופיה' .בנוסף, פרסם למעלה משבעים מאמרים מקצועיים (ב- 1997 קיבל את הפרס לביטחון פנים (יחד עם פרופ' ברוך כחלון, מתמטיקאי .על פיתוח מודל מתמטי מיוחד וחדשני לזיהוי פרצופים Fellow לפרופ' רקובר מעמד של American Psychological Society -ב :ספרות 1986 - לפני היות הליצן - ספרית מעריב 1990 - ממי אתה מפחד, דב? - הוצאת הקיבוץ המאוחד 1997 - חלום בשלוש בלילה - הוצאת כנרת 2002 - גזר הדין ה3- - הוצאת אסטרולוג 2005 -משחק הזוגות - הוצאת ביתן 2009 - כלא המשאלות - הוצאת כרמל

Mats Rosenberg is a Swedish philosopher, translator and Professor in rhetoric and the Uppsala University. Since October 1, 2014, Rosengren holds the chair of Rhetoric at the Department of Literature. He is a member of the editorial board of Glänta and of the board of the Swedish Ernst Cassirer Society. His main interests lie in the fields of theory and history of rhetoric, epistemology and theory of science, French philosophy, cave art and artistic research. He has written on Plato, Montaigne, Chaim Perelman, Cornelius Castoriadis, Ernst Cassirer and Gilles Deleuze. Rosengren’s latest major work is a study focusing on the discovery of paleolithic cave art and the development of the discipline cave 'art studies', seen from a doxological perspective: Cave Art, Perception and Knowledge (Palgrave Macmillan 2012). For the moment he is working on a book on Cornelius Castoriadis' philosophy. Rosengren is also a translator, mainly of French philosophy, and an editor, most notably of the now completed Logos/Pathos series at Glänta Produktion. Doxology – a rhetorical approach to epistemology Since 2002 Rosengren has been working on developing an 'other' take on epistemology. He has chosen to call his epistemic stance doxological in order to emphasise that all knowledge is doxic knowledge, thus turning the seminal Platonic distinction between doxa (beliefs, opinions) and episteme (objective, eternal knowledge) upside down. Protagoras dictum advocating man as the measure of all things is, perhaps, the most poignant expression of a doxological position, stating explicitly that no apprehension escapes the human-related conditions of knowledge alluded to in Protagoras' fragment. Departing from the pivotal question "What would a Protagorean position imply for epistemology today?", Rosengren develops a critique of the purely discursive notion of knowledge, still central in Anglo-Saxon epistemology. He emphasizes the fact that our knowledge is always embodied, in ourselves as biological beings as well as formulated and/or preserved in some language, institution or ritual; practiced and upheld by one or many individuals, always in one historical moment or other and within the admittedly diffuse framework of an ever changing but still specific social situation. Doxology is not a relativism abandoning all claims to objectivity or science – far from it – but an attempt, in the wake of the serious and fundamental criticisms of the late 20th century, to readdress and reconsider what knowledge, science and objectivity could be today. Nor is doxology a teaching about apparent or illusory knowledge, but about situated, variable and interested knowledge. In short it is a teaching about how we actually do create the knowledge that we need – in science as well as in life. In his publications on doxology Rosengen has tried to formulate and develop a concept of knowledge taking heed of all these factors. First introduced in 2002, this concept, doxology, has now become wildly used within the social and human sciences in Scandinavia.