The play centers on a conversation between two a man and a woman, who discuss a crime that the woman has committed. The man, a lawyer or judge figure, listens to her confession and begins to challenge her understanding of what constitutes a crime. Throughout the dialogue, Strindberg examines the subjective nature of crime, suggesting that what society deems criminal is not always aligned with an individual's inner moral compass. The woman defends her actions, arguing that the crime she committed was justified, while the man reflects on the complexities of human behavior and the social judgments placed on individuals. There Are Crimes and Crimes reflects Strindberg's growing interest in moral relativism, questioning the rigidity of social norms and legal systems. The play delves into the psychological and emotional justifications behind human actions, exploring the boundaries between right and wrong. Strindberg uses this work to highlight the tensions between personal conscience and societal judgment, offering a critical reflection on how crimes are perceived and prosecuted.